E. Jean Carroll Collects $5.6 Million From Trump, but the Larger $83.3 Million Fight Is Not Over.
For years, the money existed mainly as a number attached to a courtroom verdict. Now it has reached E. Jean Carroll. Carroll has received approximately $5.63 million from funds President Donald Trump deposited with a federal court while challenging the 2023 civil judgment against him. The payment includes the original $5 million award and accumulated interest. It marks the first time Carroll has collected money from Trump despite winning two civil verdicts totaling $88.3 million.
The transfer closes an important chapter, but it does not end the broader conflict. Trump continues to deny Carroll’s allegations; his lawyers are still contesting the release, and a separate $83.3 million defamation judgment remains the far larger financial issue.
The money arrived. The appeals failed. The stakes remain.

A federal jury in Manhattan found Trump liable in May 2023 for sexually abusing Carroll in a department store in the mid-1990s and later defaming her. The civil jury awarded Carroll $5 million in compensatory and punitive damages. Trump denied the allegations and appealed. While the appeal moved through the courts, the money was placed in a court-controlled account. The latest development was therefore not a newly negotiated settlement or a voluntary agreement between the two sides. It was the release of funds that had already been secured during Trump’s legal challenge.
The amount ultimately released was about $5.63 million, reflecting the jury award plus interest. Carroll’s legal team confirmed that the funds had been received after U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered their release.
The turning point came on June 29, 2026, when the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Trump’s appeal. The justices did not issue a detailed explanation, but their decision left the lower-court judgment in place. Trump’s attorneys later requested a rehearing and argued that releasing the funds could cause “irreparable harm” if Carroll spent or donated the money before every possible legal request had been resolved. Her lawyers said the payment would remain in an interest-bearing retirement account.
One verdict is paid. Another is much larger. Nothing feels finished.
The payment may appear to be the end of the Carroll case, but there are two separate judgments. The $5 million award came from the 2023 trial involving Carroll’s battery claim and Trump’s statements denying her account. A second jury returned an $83.3 million verdict in January 2024 after considering additional defamatory statements Trump made about Carroll.
That later award included punitive and compensatory damages tied to reputational harm and emotional distress. Trump has appealed that judgment and secured a bond exceeding $91 million while the challenge moves forward. Together, the verdicts total $88.3 million before further interest and related costs. Carroll has now collected the smaller judgment, but the larger award remains unresolved and could eventually reach the Supreme Court.
That is why the payment is both significant and incomplete. It converts one verdict into money Carroll can control, yet it leaves the financial center of the dispute untouched. Trump’s legal strategy has focused on overturning the verdicts, disputing evidence admitted at trial and arguing that the proceedings were unfair. His representatives have repeatedly described Carroll’s allegations and lawsuits as politically motivated. The juries rejected those arguments and found him liable under the civil standard of proof.
The payment carries weight. The wording matters. The case was civil.

Trump was not criminally prosecuted in Carroll’s lawsuit. The 2023 proceeding was a civil case in which jurors decided liability under a lower burden of proof than the standard used in criminal trials. The jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation. It did not find him liable for rape under the specific New York legal definition presented at the trial.
Carroll brought the battery claim under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which temporarily allowed people alleging older sexual abuse to file civil lawsuits after the usual time limit had expired. She had already sued Trump for defamation after he publicly denied her account and attacked her credibility.
Trump has maintained that the encounter never happened and that he did not know Carroll. His legal team continues to dispute the evidence, the verdict, and the damages. The payment does not erase those denials. It does, however, enforce the judgment reached by a nine-person federal jury and left standing through the appellate process.
Years passed. Interest grew. The judgment became real.
A verdict can dominate headlines on the day it is announced, but collecting an award can take years. Carroll won the $5 million judgment in May 2023. Trump appealed; the funds remained protected, interest accumulated, and the dispute moved through multiple levels of review. More than three years later, the figure on the verdict form became a payment of more than $5.6 million.
Carroll announced that she had received the money. Her attorney, Roberta Kaplan, said the disbursement reflected the unanimous jury verdict holding Trump accountable.
Trump’s lawyers have not abandoned their efforts. A rehearing request related to the Supreme Court’s refusal remains part of the legal record, and the separate $83.3 million judgment presents another possible high-court battle. Still, the practical reality has changed. Carroll no longer holds only a favorable judgment in the first case. She holds the money awarded by the jury, plus the interest generated during Trump’s effort to overturn the verdict.
